Some people call it a masterpiece, and I’m pretty sure I agree. I was physically hurting during the whole film, but in the best way possible. It was so fascinating in the psychological aspect, beautifully showing how the human mind copes with certain situations. It was breathtaking in the visual aspect, depicting scenes, themes and symbolism in a way that merges painting and video – two art forms that can look forced and unnatural together, but here feel organic and very necessary for the overall vision. The same is to be said of the music, the use of classical compositions by Wagner added an epic feel, something that is needed for a movie that treats this big of a theme – anything less dramatic would have ruined it.

And lastly, the emotional aspect – completely heartbreaking.In the opening scene, we are shown how Earth is swallowed by this unknown blue planet, and during the whole film, we get to follow two sisters in the events leading up to the apocalypse. Before watching the movie, I thought I had an idea of how it would be carried out –  I was wrong. So very wrong. It was all set up in a way that, after the final scene, left me shivering with tears streaming down my face. We are alone on this planet. The universe is close to infinite, and there may be life outside of our atmosphere, but when it comes down to it, this, and only this, is our world. And imagine if it all turned to nothing – there would be nowhere to hide. No way to escape it. No way to save yourself. Everything would be gone, and no one would be around to miss it. And even though the apocalypse usually seems so incomprehensible, this film made it feel very real. For two hours, I actually believed that the world was ending. And how would you cope with that? You wouldn’t. Not really. But that doesn’t matter. Because you’d be gone anyway.

Kirsten Dunst as Justine, Cameron Spurr as Leo, and Charlotte Gainsbourg as Claire in Melancholia (2011)

2 thoughts on “Melancholia.

  1. You make an improbable event sound interesting to think about. So I think your post interesting. In my blog I explore things unseen that seem to be real. I have theories but no answers. Do you think Existentialism began with a nation in the throngs of melancholia after WWII? Is the term melancholia used as a noun or an adverb?

    • I think that questioning the meaning of life has, in one way or the other, been with humans since the beginning, but existentialism as a concrete philosophy was probably a consequence of the melancholia that the people felt after WWII. However, I do not think that it’s the noun. The main word, I think, is doubt, which was caused by the melancholia. However, now that I think about it, there may not be one sole reason, a single noun, but a cacophony of adverbs that are all equal in impact. Feelings like melancholia, angst, grief and despair are sometimes considered synonyms, but I think that the different nuances of the meaning added up and produced the thought in the people’s minds that said: “Why?” and eventually came to the conlusion that life isn’t as simple as they initially thought.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s